[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":370},["ShallowReactive",2],{"guide-facebook-ad-account-appeal-template":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"answer":6,"authorId":7,"body":8,"category":294,"ctaVariant":295,"dataset":294,"description":296,"examples":297,"extension":298,"faqs":299,"heroImage":324,"intro":325,"meta":326,"navigation":327,"path":328,"publishedAt":329,"seo":330,"sources":331,"stats":348,"stem":368,"updatedAt":329,"__hash__":369},"blog\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-account-appeal-template.md","Facebook Ad Account Appeal: Steps + Template","To appeal, open Account Quality, identify exactly which asset was actioned (ad, ad account, Page, personal account, or Business Account), read the policy Meta cited, and use Request Review on that specific decision. Meta says automated ad reviews typically complete within 24 hours but may take longer, and it publishes no guaranteed timeline or success rate for restriction appeals, so keep your message short, factual, and evidence-backed.","likit-sae-lee",{"type":9,"value":10,"toc":279},"minimark",[11,16,20,23,26,30,33,36,114,128,132,135,148,151,155,158,161,169,173,176,179,182,186,189,200,203,207,210,213,221,225,228,232,235,238,242,245,248,251,255,258,261,265,268,276],[12,13,15],"h2",{"id":14},"the-short-version-how-the-appeal-actually-works","The short version: how the appeal actually works",[17,18,19],"p",{},"When Meta rejects an ad or restricts an asset, it does not leave you without a route back. Meta states plainly: \"If you think your ad was mistakenly rejected, or if you think your Business Account or its assets were mistakenly restricted, you can request a review of either decision in Account Quality.\" That single sentence is the backbone of every appeal. Your job is to find the actioned asset, read the reason Meta gives, and request a review of that exact decision, either arguing it was an error or showing that you have fixed the problem.",[17,21,22],{},"The mistake most advertisers make is skipping straight to writing an angry message. The appeal text matters, but it comes last. Before you type a word, you diagnose which asset was hit and what policy Meta cited, because the review request is filed against a specific decision, and appealing the wrong one wastes an attempt. Meta also frames the whole exercise clearly: \"It is an advertiser's responsibility to understand and comply with our policies.\" That is not a comforting line, but it tells you how to write your appeal. You show that you understand the policy and either comply with it or have corrected course.",[17,24,25],{},"Two honesty points to set expectations up front. First, Meta says automated ad reviews \"typically complete within 24 hours, though may take longer in some cases,\" but it publishes no equivalent committed timeline for restriction appeals. Second, there is no published success rate and no guarantee of reinstatement. Outcomes vary case by case, and anyone promising you a fixed number or a magic phrase is guessing.",[12,27,29],{"id":28},"step-1-diagnose-which-asset-was-actioned","Step 1: diagnose which asset was actioned",[17,31,32],{},"Enforcement is not one-size-fits-all. Meta confirms that a rejection or restriction can apply to \"the ad, ad account, user account, Page or Business Account,\" and you request a review of whichever decision was incorrect. Those five layers behave very differently, and treating a Page restriction as if it were a single rejected ad will get you nowhere.",[17,34,35],{},"Open the Account Quality tool inside Meta Business Suite or Business Manager and look at what is actually flagged. The dashboard is commonly reached at the Account Quality URL under your business settings. Read the enforcement listing and the cited policy word for word before deciding what to appeal. Account Quality lists your assets and flags each one with its status, so scan every level rather than stopping at the first warning you notice. A single rejected ad and an account-wide restriction look different in the dashboard, and the fix for each is different, so note the exact wording of the status and the policy label sitting next to it, because that is precisely what you will quote back in the appeal.",[37,38,39,55],"table",{},[40,41,42],"thead",{},[43,44,45,49,52],"tr",{},[46,47,48],"th",{},"Asset actioned",[46,50,51],{},"What it means",[46,53,54],{},"Where to appeal",[56,57,58,70,81,92,103],"tbody",{},[43,59,60,64,67],{},[61,62,63],"td",{},"Single ad",[61,65,66],{},"One creative was rejected; the account is otherwise fine",[61,68,69],{},"Request Review next to the ad in Ads Manager or Account Quality",[43,71,72,75,78],{},[61,73,74],{},"Ad account",[61,76,77],{},"The account cannot spend; all its ads are affected",[61,79,80],{},"Account Quality, against the ad account",[43,82,83,86,89],{},[61,84,85],{},"Page",[61,87,88],{},"The Facebook Page is restricted from advertising",[61,90,91],{},"Account Quality, against the Page",[43,93,94,97,100],{},[61,95,96],{},"User (personal) account",[61,98,99],{},"Your personal profile is restricted from advertising",[61,101,102],{},"Account Quality, against the user account",[43,104,105,108,111],{},[61,106,107],{},"Business Account \u002F portfolio",[61,109,110],{},"Top-level restriction that cascades to everything inside",[61,112,113],{},"Account Quality or Business Support Home, against the Business Account",[17,115,116,117,122,123,127],{},"The portfolio row is the one to respect most. A restriction at the Business Manager or business portfolio level can affect every user and every ad account inside that portfolio. If your whole business is frozen, appealing one rejected ad is like bailing water without plugging the leak. Identify the top-level asset first, appeal that, and the layers beneath it come back with it. If you are unsure whether you are looking at an account-level block or something narrower, our guide to a ",[118,119,121],"a",{"href":120},"\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-account-disabled","disabled Facebook ad account"," and the companion piece on a ",[118,124,126],{"href":125},"\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-account-restricted","restricted ad account"," walk through how to tell them apart.",[12,129,131],{"id":130},"step-2-read-the-exact-policy-meta-cited","Step 2: read the exact policy Meta cited",[17,133,134],{},"Every enforcement comes with a reason. On a rejected ad, Meta sends \"an email notification explaining the reason,\" and the same detail appears in Account Quality. Do not skim it. The cited policy is the entire subject of your appeal, and a message that talks around it instead of addressing it reads as evasive.",[17,136,137,138,142,143,147],{},"If the notice references a specific restricted category, a prohibited claim, or a landing-page problem, your appeal has to answer that precise point. This is where reading the underlying rules pays off. Our overview of ",[118,139,141],{"href":140},"\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-policies","Facebook ad policies"," and the breakdown of why an ",[118,144,146],{"href":145},"\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-rejected","ad gets rejected"," help you translate Meta's short enforcement label into the actual clause you tripped. When you can name the policy and explain, factually, why your ad complies or how you changed it to comply, your appeal stops being a complaint and becomes an argument.",[17,149,150],{},"Remember too that a restriction is not always tied to a brand-new ad. Meta notes that ads \"remain subject to re-review at any time and may be rejected or restricted for policy violations.\" A campaign that ran cleanly for weeks can be re-reviewed and actioned later, so the trigger might be an old creative, not the last thing you launched. Check the date and the specific asset in the enforcement notice rather than assuming it is your newest ad.",[12,152,154],{"id":153},"step-3-choose-your-route-appeal-or-edit","Step 3: choose your route, appeal or edit",[17,156,157],{},"You have more than one legitimate path, and picking the right one is half the battle. Meta gives a rejected-ad advertiser three options: request a review, edit the ad, or create a new ad. Crucially, \"edited or new ads are treated as new ads and reviewed by our ad review system.\" That reshapes how you think about the whole process.",[17,159,160],{},"Requesting a review asks Meta to look again at the original decision. Use it when you genuinely believe the enforcement was a mistake, or when an account, Page, or portfolio was restricted and there is nothing to edit your way out of. Editing or recreating the ad is the route when you can see the problem and simply want to comply. Because an edited ad is treated as new, it is not a duplicate appeal and does not clash with a pending account review; it runs through ad review on its own track.",[17,162,163,164,168],{},"In practice, if a single ad was rejected over something obvious, like a claim you can soften or an overlay you can remove, editing is often faster than waiting on a formal review. If the block is at account or Page level, editing individual ads will not lift it, and you need the review request. When you are unsure whether an ad is still processing or has been fully rejected, the guide on an ",[118,165,167],{"href":166},"\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-in-review","ad stuck in review"," explains the difference so you do not appeal something that was never actually declined.",[12,170,172],{"id":171},"step-4-write-a-short-factual-appeal","Step 4: write a short, factual appeal",[17,174,175],{},"Once you know the asset, the policy, and the route, the writing is the easy part, as long as you keep it disciplined. The strongest appeals share four traits: they are short, calm, specific, and backed by evidence.",[17,177,178],{},"Acknowledge the decision without arguing emotionally. If you believe it was an enforcement error, say so plainly and explain why your ad complies with the cited policy. If there genuinely was an issue, state the specific corrective action you already took: edited the copy, removed the disputed claim, fixed the landing page, updated the payment method, or completed business verification. Reference the exact ad or asset and the exact policy. Then point to concrete evidence, whether that is a screenshot, your business registration, or product and licence documentation.",[17,180,181],{},"What to leave out matters as much. Skip the frustration, the threats to leave the platform, and the long backstory. Reviewers, human or automated, act on facts. A tight message that quotes the policy and shows a fix will always outperform three paragraphs of grievance. Because Meta puts compliance squarely on the advertiser, an appeal that demonstrates you understand the rule is inherently more persuasive than one that pleads ignorance.",[12,183,185],{"id":184},"a-fill-in-the-blanks-appeal-template","A fill-in-the-blanks appeal template",[17,187,188],{},"Copy this, replace every bracket, and cut anything that does not apply. Keep it to a few short paragraphs.",[190,191,196],"pre",{"className":192,"code":194,"language":195},[193],"language-text","Subject \u002F reference: Review request for [ad account ID \u002F asset name]\n\nHello,\n\nI am requesting a review of the [rejection \u002F restriction] applied to\n[ad name \u002F ad account ID \u002F Page name \u002F Business Account] on\n[date of restriction]. The enforcement cites [exact policy cited].\n\n[Choose ONE:]\n- I believe this decision was made in error. The ad complies with\n  [policy cited] because [factual reason, one or two sentences].\n- I understand the concern. I have since [specific correction you made:\n  removed the claim \u002F edited the copy \u002F updated the landing page \u002F\n  fixed the payment method \u002F completed business verification].\n\nTo support this, I have attached [evidence: screenshots \u002F business\nregistration \u002F product or licence documentation].\n\nPlease re-review [ad name \u002F asset]. I am happy to provide any further\ninformation needed.\n\nThank you,\n[Name], [role], [business name]\n","text",[197,198,194],"code",{"__ignoreMap":199},"",[17,201,202],{},"Notice what the template forces you to do: name the asset, quote the policy, pick a single clear position, and attach proof. That structure is the point. It keeps you factual and stops the message drifting into complaint. Fill it in once per affected asset, not once per ad, and do not send five variations hoping one lands.",[12,204,206],{"id":205},"step-5-submit-then-wait-do-not-spam","Step 5: submit, then wait, do not spam",[17,208,209],{},"Where you click depends on the asset. For a rejected single ad, the Request Review button sits next to the ad in Ads Manager and in Account Quality. For a restricted account, Page, or Business Account, open Account Quality, select the affected asset, and use the Request Review option. An alternate entry point many advertisers rely on is Business Support Home: open Account overview, find the restricted account, and its 'What you can do' section surfaces the 'Request review' action. All of these lead to the same review.",[17,211,212],{},"After you submit, stop. Do not file a second request while the first is pending. Submitting multiple simultaneous or rapid-fire reviews can be counterproductive and eats into a limited number of attempts. Wait for the decision on the one you sent. If you want to make progress in parallel, the legitimate move is to edit the offending ad and resubmit it as a new ad, which goes through fresh ad review without touching your pending account appeal. That is a separate track, not a duplicate.",[17,214,215,216,220],{},"Set your expectations with Meta's own words. Automated ad review \"typically complete",[217,218,219],"span",{},"s"," within 24 hours, though may take longer in some cases.\" For restriction appeals there is no committed figure at all. You may see it resolve quickly or wait considerably longer, and neither outcome means you did something wrong.",[12,222,224],{"id":223},"common-mistakes-that-waste-an-attempt","Common mistakes that waste an attempt",[17,226,227],{},"Because attempts are limited, the errors that cost you one are worth naming. The first is appealing the wrong asset: firing off a review for a single rejected ad when the real block sits on your ad account or Business Account. Diagnose the top-level asset before you click anything. The second is treating the appeal as a complaint box, venting frustration or threatening to move your spend elsewhere, when reviewers respond only to facts and evidence. The third is ignoring the cited policy and writing generic reassurance that never addresses what Meta actually flagged. The fourth is assuming your newest ad triggered the action, when Meta re-reviews old creatives at any time and the real cause may be a campaign that ran cleanly for weeks. The fifth, and most expensive, is impatience: submitting several requests in quick succession, which can be counterproductive and drains your remaining attempts without moving anything forward. Slow down, diagnose the asset, write once, and wait for the decision before you touch anything else.",[12,229,231],{"id":230},"what-meta-does-and-does-not-promise-on-timing","What Meta does and does not promise on timing",[17,233,234],{},"It is worth being blunt about the numbers because misinformation here is everywhere. The only timing Meta publishes is the 24-hour typical window for ad review, and even that carries the caveat that it can take longer. Meta's ad-rejection guidance describes how to request a review but states no timeline for the review and no guarantee of approval or reinstatement. There is no published success rate.",[17,236,237],{},"You will find secondary sources quoting 24 to 48 hours, or up to 30 days, for restriction appeals. Those are not Meta-stated figures, so treat them as rough anecdotes, not commitments. If a tool or agency guarantees a specific turnaround or a reinstatement rate, they are inventing certainty that Meta itself does not offer. The honest planning assumption is variability: prepare a strong appeal, submit it promptly, and do not build your cash-flow plan around a fixed reinstatement date. If a restriction lands mid-campaign, pause the spend that depended on it, tell your team the timeline is open-ended, and keep your evidence assembled so you can submit the moment you have diagnosed the asset. Treating the appeal as urgent while treating the outcome as uncertain is the only defensible stance.",[12,239,241],{"id":240},"if-the-first-review-fails-escalation","If the first review fails: escalation",[17,243,244],{},"A denied appeal is not always the end, but your remaining moves are finite. Three things are worth trying, in order.",[17,246,247],{},"First, edit the ad to comply and submit it as a new ad. Because Meta re-reviews edited and new ads from scratch, a compliant version can go live even if the original decision stands. Second, re-check Account Quality for updated instructions. Meta sometimes surfaces additional steps after a review, such as identity or business verification, or a payment fix, and completing those can be what actually clears a restriction. Third, where the option is offered, use Meta's Business Help or support-case channels to follow up.",[17,249,250],{},"Two limits to keep in mind. The number of review attempts is limited, though Meta does not publish the exact count, so treat each one as valuable. And once Meta treats a decision as final, further appeals of that same decision may not be available. That finality is the strongest argument for getting your diagnosis and your first appeal right rather than firing off quick attempts and hoping.",[12,252,254],{"id":253},"deadlines-and-the-180-day-question","Deadlines and the 180-day question",[17,256,257],{},"Advertisers often ask how long they have to appeal. Meta shows the applicable timeframe inside your own notification and Account Quality notice, and that is the version you should trust. You will see references elsewhere to a 180-day window from the restriction, after which disabled or restricted accounts may not be reinstatable. That figure appears in secondary sources and Help Center search snippets, but the official article body did not render reliably on our checks, so we will not assert it as confirmed. Verify the exact timeframe in your own notice rather than assuming 180 days applies to your case.",[17,259,260],{},"The practical takeaway is the same regardless of the exact number: do not wait. Open Account Quality as soon as you are notified, note the timeframe it shows, gather your evidence, and submit promptly. An appeal filed while the enforcement is fresh, with documentation ready, is always stronger than one you sit on while testing an unverified deadline.",[12,262,264],{"id":263},"prevent-the-next-one","Prevent the next one",[17,266,267],{},"Getting reinstated is a relief, not a reset. Because ads \"remain subject to re-review at any time,\" a clean account today can be actioned tomorrow if the underlying creative or claim was borderline. The durable fix is to write ads that do not test the policy line in the first place, and to keep your own record of what each ad claimed so that any future re-review is easy to answer.",[17,269,270,271,275],{},"That is partly a research discipline. Studying how compliant advertisers in your category frame their claims, and building from formats that clear review consistently, cuts your rejection rate before you ever launch. It also pays to keep a plain record of the exact wording, images, and landing pages behind each ad, dated and stored where you can find it, so that if a re-review lands months later you can answer it in minutes instead of reconstructing what the ad said. Keeping research, creative, and launch records in one place, on a platform like AdPlay.ai or in your own organised system, makes a future appeal far quicker because the evidence is already assembled. If you are still building the fundamentals, the pillar guide on ",[118,272,274],{"href":273},"\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-run-a-facebook-ad","how to run a Facebook ad"," covers the setup that keeps accounts healthy before your next launch rather than after your next rejection.",[17,277,278],{},"The whole appeal system rewards the same thing: understanding the policy, addressing the specific decision, and showing your work. Diagnose the right asset, quote the exact rule, pick one clear position, attach evidence, submit once, and wait. That approach will not guarantee reinstatement, because nothing can, but it gives each of your limited attempts the best possible chance.",{"title":199,"searchDepth":280,"depth":280,"links":281},2,[282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293],{"id":14,"depth":280,"text":15},{"id":28,"depth":280,"text":29},{"id":130,"depth":280,"text":131},{"id":153,"depth":280,"text":154},{"id":171,"depth":280,"text":172},{"id":184,"depth":280,"text":185},{"id":205,"depth":280,"text":206},{"id":223,"depth":280,"text":224},{"id":230,"depth":280,"text":231},{"id":240,"depth":280,"text":241},{"id":253,"depth":280,"text":254},{"id":263,"depth":280,"text":264},null,"neutral","How to appeal a rejected ad or restricted Facebook account through Meta's Account Quality tool, plus a fill-in-the-blanks appeal template that keeps it factual.",[],"md",[300,303,306,309,312,315,318,321],{"question":301,"answer":302},"Where exactly do I appeal a restricted Facebook ad account?","Meta directs you to the Account Quality tool, reachable inside Meta Business Suite or Business Manager and commonly opened at the Account Quality dashboard. Find the affected asset in the list, open it, read the enforcement reason Meta shows, and use the Request Review option tied to that specific decision. For a single rejected ad, the same Request Review action appears next to the ad in Ads Manager. Many advertisers also reach the flow through Business Support Home, where the restricted account's 'What you can do' section surfaces a 'Request review' action. All three routes lead to the same review request. The important part is appealing the correct asset, not just the first red banner you see.",{"question":304,"answer":305},"How long does a Facebook ad account appeal take?","Meta only publishes one timing figure: automated ad review typically completes within 24 hours, though it may take longer in some cases. It does not publish any committed timeline for reviewing restriction appeals, nor a success rate. That means an appeal can resolve in a day or drag on considerably longer, and no honest source can promise you a specific number. Secondary write-ups cite ranges like 24 to 48 hours or up to 30 days, but those are not Meta-stated figures, so treat them as anecdotes rather than guarantees. Submit your review, then wait for that decision before doing anything else. Filing again while one is pending does not speed it up.",{"question":307,"answer":308},"What should I write in the appeal message?","Keep it short, calm, and factual. Name the exact ad or asset and the policy Meta cited, state plainly whether you believe this was an enforcement error or a genuine issue, and if there was an issue, describe the specific correction you already made, such as removing a claim, editing copy, fixing the landing page, updating the payment method, or completing business verification. Attach concrete evidence: screenshots, business registration, or product and licence documentation. Avoid arguing emotionally, threatening to leave, or writing paragraphs of frustration. Reviewers act on facts and evidence, not tone. A tight three-paragraph message that shows you understand the policy and fixed the problem reads far better than a long complaint.",{"question":310,"answer":311},"Is it better to appeal or just edit the ad?","They are two legitimate and separate routes. Requesting a review asks Meta to re-examine the original decision, which is right when you believe the enforcement was a mistake. Editing the ad, or creating a new one, is right when you can see the issue and want to comply. Meta treats an edited or new ad as a brand-new ad that goes through ad review from scratch, so it is not a duplicate appeal and does not conflict with a pending review of the account. If a single ad was rejected and the fix is obvious, editing is often the faster path. If an account or Page was restricted, editing one ad will not resolve that; you need the review request.",{"question":313,"answer":314},"Can I appeal more than once?","You can request a review a limited number of times, but Meta does not publish the exact maximum, so plan as though attempts are scarce. Do not fire off multiple simultaneous requests; that can be counterproductive and burns your attempts without helping. Wait for one review to return a decision, read any updated instructions in Account Quality, fix whatever it flags, and only then consider another request if the option is still offered. Once Meta treats a decision as final, further appeals of that same decision may no longer be available at all. This is exactly why diagnosing the correct asset and writing a strong first appeal matters more than volume.",{"question":316,"answer":317},"What if my whole Business Manager is restricted, not just one ad?","A restriction at the business portfolio level cascades. It can affect every user and every ad account inside that portfolio, which is why you must identify the top-level asset before appealing anything smaller. If you appeal a single ad while the Business Account itself is restricted, you are treating a symptom and leaving the cause in place. Open Account Quality, look for enforcement listed against the Business Account or portfolio, and request the review there. Expect Meta to sometimes ask for additional verification, such as identity or business verification, as part of clearing a portfolio-level restriction. Resolving the top-level asset is what restores the accounts and users beneath it.",{"question":319,"answer":320},"Do I need a specific reason before I can appeal?","Yes, and Meta gives it to you. When an ad is rejected you receive an email notification explaining the reason, and the enforcement detail is also shown in Account Quality against the actioned asset. Read that cited policy carefully before writing anything, because your appeal should speak directly to it. If the notice says a prohibited claim, your message should address that claim specifically, not generic policy. Meta is explicit that understanding and complying with its policies is the advertiser's own responsibility, so 'I did not know' is a weak position. Quote the exact policy in your appeal and explain, factually, why your ad complies or how you corrected it to comply.",{"question":322,"answer":323},"Is there a deadline to submit an appeal?","Meta shows timeframes inside your own notification and Account Quality notice, and you should treat those as the authority. Some secondary sources mention a 180-day window from the restriction, after which disabled or restricted accounts may not be reinstatable, but Meta's official article body did not load reliably to confirm that figure, so do not assume it applies to your case. The safe approach is simple: do not wait. Open Account Quality as soon as you are notified, check the exact timeframe shown there, and submit your review promptly. Appealing while the enforcement is fresh, with evidence ready, is always better than sitting on it and testing an unverified deadline.","\u002Fimages\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-account-appeal-template-hero.webp","You logged in to a rejected ad, a paused campaign, or a red 'restricted' banner, and now you need to say the right thing to get back on. The good news is that Meta gives you a defined path to request a review. The catch is that a sloppy or emotional appeal wastes one of a limited number of attempts. This guide walks the exact steps and gives you a template you can fill in.",{},true,"\u002Fblog\u002Ffacebook-ad-account-appeal-template","2026-09-20",{"title":5,"description":296},[332,336,339,342,345],{"label":333,"url":334,"year":335},"Meta Transparency Center - Introduction to the Advertising Standards","https:\u002F\u002Ftransparency.meta.com\u002Fpolicies\u002Fad-standards\u002F","2026",{"label":337,"url":338,"year":335},"Meta Business - Resolve your ad rejection and get tips (ad policy guidance)","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002Fbusiness\u002Fm\u002Fsmall-business\u002Fad-policy-guidance",{"label":340,"url":341,"year":335},"Meta Business Help Center - Request a review if you are restricted from advertising","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002Fbusiness\u002Fhelp\u002F530209463124901",{"label":343,"url":344,"year":335},"Meta Business Help Center - About Advertising Restrictions","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002Fbusiness\u002Fhelp\u002F975570072950669",{"label":346,"url":347,"year":335},"Meta Business Help Center - Troubleshoot a Disabled or Restricted Account","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002Fbusiness\u002Fhelp\u002F422289316306981",[349,353,356,360,363,365],{"label":350,"value":351,"source":352},"Typical automated ad review time","24 hours","Meta Transparency Center, 2026",{"label":354,"value":355,"source":352},"Asset types Meta can reject or restrict","5",{"label":357,"value":358,"source":359},"Options after an ad rejection","3","Meta Business, 2026",{"label":361,"value":362,"source":359},"Meta-published appeal success rate","None",{"label":364,"value":362,"source":359},"Committed timeline for restriction reviews",{"label":366,"value":367,"source":352},"Who owns policy compliance","The advertiser","blog\u002Ffacebook-ad-account-appeal-template","Ule5yv5Tfeo-FcX3g0O9geWMvaguCO-j5G4IlsZTieQ",1786093697950]